For Filipino SME workflow automation (peso pricing)
Make.com vs Zapier
Last updated: May 2026
Make.com (formerly Integromat) and Zapier are the two dominant no-code automation tools for SMEs. Both connect SaaS apps via triggers and actions, both are non-technical, and both work for the typical Philippine SME stack — Messenger, Google Sheets, Calendar, Gmail.
For Filipino SMEs the practical difference is pricing: Make.com's free tier covers 1,000 operations per month and paid plans are roughly 30–50% cheaper than Zapier at the same volume. Zapier's app library is broader, which only matters if you need a niche integration. For 9 out of 10 SME stacks, Make.com is the better economic choice.
Make.com vs Zapier — by criterion
Each row picks a winner. "Tie" means both options are roughly equivalent on that criterion.
| Criterion | Make.com | Zapier | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 1,000 operations/month — covers most SMEs at single-location volume. | 100 tasks/month — enough only for the smallest workflows. | Make.com |
| Pricing at ~5,000 operations/month | Core plan ~₱600/month. | Starter plan ~₱1,200/month. | Make.com |
| Integrations available | ~1,800 apps. Covers everything most SMEs use. | ~6,000 apps. Wins on niche or long-tail integrations. | Zapier |
| Visual workflow editor | Scenario-based with branches and routers — handles complex logic cleanly. | Linear Zap structure — clean for simple A→B flows, awkward for complex ones. | Make.com |
| Learning curve | Slightly more concepts to learn (modules, scenarios, routers). | More forgiving for first-time users. | Zapier |
| Reliability at SME volume | Solid. Good error handling, retry logic, and execution history. | Solid. Slightly better polish overall. | Tie |
| Self-hostable alternative | No, but n8n is broadly compatible if you outgrow it. | No. | Make.com |
Recommendations by use case
The right answer depends on the business. Find the row that matches yours.
Single-location SME (transient house, clinic, salon) with standard tools
Make.com's free tier alone often covers everything you need. Even if you outgrow it, paid plans are meaningfully cheaper at the volumes typical for a Philippine SME.
You depend on a niche app not commonly integrated
Zapier's integration library is roughly 3× larger. If your stack includes a long-tail SaaS tool, Zapier likely supports it where Make.com may not.
Complex multi-step workflows with branching logic
Make.com's scenario editor handles routers and conditional branches cleanly. Zapier's linear Zap structure becomes hard to read past 5–6 steps.
First-time user with no automation experience
Zapier's onboarding is more forgiving. If learning the tool is the main constraint, Zapier gets you to a working automation fastest.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper for a Filipino SME — Make.com or Zapier?
Can I switch from Zapier to Make.com later?
Which one is better for Messenger + Google Sheets workflows?
Does Make.com or Zapier work with Anthropic Claude?
When should I use n8n instead of either?
Related comparisons
ManyChat vs Claude API
No-code rule-based chatbots vs custom AI chatbots — for Filipino Messenger automation, peso pricing, and which wins by use case.
Hiring a VA vs an AI Chatbot
A Filipino VA at ₱20,000/month vs a Claude-based chatbot at ₱1,000/month — what each covers, what each misses, and when to use which.
Want a real recommendation for your business?
Free 30-minute audit. I'll tell you honestly which fits your operation — and what trade-offs you're actually making.